Section 10A and related deductions: Tribunal rejects separate-undertaking claim, but allows loss set-off, ESOP cost and foreign tax credit in principl...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4201 to 4220 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A vehicle-specific front camera module was classified under CTI 8708 99 00 because it was engineered solely for motor vehicle ADAS use and had no alternate commercial application. The text states it could not fall under Heading 9032, as it lacked independent measuring sensors and actuating devices needed to complete a control loop, so it was legally outside Chapter 90. Applying the Section XVII notes, the module was treated as a motor vehicle part and accessory, not as a Chapter 85 or Chapter 90 article, and the claim for CTI 9032 89 90 was rejected.
A vehicle-specific front camera module was classified under CTI 8708 99 00 because it was engineered solely for motor vehicle ADAS use and had no alternate commercial application. The text states it could not fall under Heading 9032, as it lacked independent measuring sensors and actuating devices needed to complete a control loop, so it was legally outside Chapter 90. Applying the Section XVII notes, the module was treated as a motor vehicle part and accessory, not as a Chapter 85 or Chapter 90 article, and the claim for CTI 9032 89 90 was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
