Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
A personal guarantor remained liable where he had signed the loan sanction letter as guarantor and executed the guarantee documents, and the debt, default and NPA status were undisputed; a separate deed of guarantee was not necessary, so the challenge to the maintainability of the personal guarantor proceedings failed. The belated plea of duress was rejected because the documents were not timely disputed and the objection arose only after default and insolvency steps began. On the Section 99 issue, the resolution professional's report was held to be recommendatory, so its absence before admission did not invalidate the proceedings where the foundational facts were already established. Admission of the application was upheld.
A personal guarantor remained liable where he had signed the loan sanction letter as guarantor and executed the guarantee documents, and the debt, default and NPA status were undisputed; a separate deed of guarantee was not necessary, so the challenge to the maintainability of the personal guarantor proceedings failed. The belated plea of duress was rejected because the documents were not timely disputed and the objection arose only after default and insolvency steps began. On the Section 99 issue, the resolution professional's report was held to be recommendatory, so its absence before admission did not invalidate the proceedings where the foundational facts were already established. Admission of the application was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.