Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revocation proceedings under the CGST Act require a specific show cause notice, consideration of the revocation application, and a reasoned order recording written reasons. The notice here did not specify the actual government dues relied on, and the rejection order failed to disclose any real reasoning, disposing of the matter only on the ground that no reply was filed in time. The HC held that this did not satisfy fair procedure or the statutory duty to record reasons, so the rejection was quashed and the matter restored for fresh notice particulars, a meaningful opportunity to respond, and a fresh reasoned decision.
Revocation proceedings under the CGST Act require a specific show cause notice, consideration of the revocation application, and a reasoned order recording written reasons. The notice here did not specify the actual government dues relied on, and the rejection order failed to disclose any real reasoning, disposing of the matter only on the ground that no reply was filed in time. The HC held that this did not satisfy fair procedure or the statutory duty to record reasons, so the rejection was quashed and the matter restored for fresh notice particulars, a meaningful opportunity to respond, and a fresh reasoned decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.