Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Mere uploading of a show-cause notice on the GST common portal, without service by at least two prescribed modes, was held insufficient and contrary to Section 169 and natural justice. The ex parte cancellation of GST registration was therefore vitiated and set aside. The appellate order was also found unsustainable because it overlooked the invalid foundational cancellation order and the absence of a real opportunity to respond. The authorities were left free to initiate fresh proceedings by issuing proper notice and passing a reasoned order in accordance with law.
Mere uploading of a show-cause notice on the GST common portal, without service by at least two prescribed modes, was held insufficient and contrary to Section 169 and natural justice. The ex parte cancellation of GST registration was therefore vitiated and set aside. The appellate order was also found unsustainable because it overlooked the invalid foundational cancellation order and the absence of a real opportunity to respond. The authorities were left free to initiate fresh proceedings by issuing proper notice and passing a reasoned order in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.