Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In GST registration cancellation matters, a show-cause notice must disclose the precise default and the relevant period so the assessee gets an effective opportunity to reply. A notice that only alleges continuous non-filing of returns, without identifying the period of default, is defective; a later cancellation order cannot cure that defect by relying on reasons not stated in the notice. The cancellation order must also be reasoned in the prescribed form. Because cancellation has adverse civil consequences, compliance with Section 29 and Rule 22 is part of natural justice. The impugned cancellation was quashed and the matter restored to the show-cause stage.
In GST registration cancellation matters, a show-cause notice must disclose the precise default and the relevant period so the assessee gets an effective opportunity to reply. A notice that only alleges continuous non-filing of returns, without identifying the period of default, is defective; a later cancellation order cannot cure that defect by relying on reasons not stated in the notice. The cancellation order must also be reasoned in the prescribed form. Because cancellation has adverse civil consequences, compliance with Section 29 and Rule 22 is part of natural justice. The impugned cancellation was quashed and the matter restored to the show-cause stage.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.