Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1021 to 1040 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A High Court granted interim protection in a GST matter by deferring adjudication where the writ petitions directly challenged the jurisdiction and validity of show-cause notices issued in Form GST DRG-01. The court noted that the rejection of adjournment was technically in line with law because no stay had been granted, but held that fixing final personal hearing for the very next day, with an indication of an ex parte final order, reflected undue haste. On a prima facie view, interference was necessary to preserve the subject matter of the writ petitions, so the hearing was to be adjourned and refixed after the writ petitions were taken up.
A High Court granted interim protection in a GST matter by deferring adjudication where the writ petitions directly challenged the jurisdiction and validity of show-cause notices issued in Form GST DRG-01. The court noted that the rejection of adjournment was technically in line with law because no stay had been granted, but held that fixing final personal hearing for the very next day, with an indication of an ex parte final order, reflected undue haste. On a prima facie view, interference was necessary to preserve the subject matter of the writ petitions, so the hearing was to be adjourned and refixed after the writ petitions were taken up.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
