Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A High Court granted interim protection in a GST matter by deferring adjudication where the writ petitions directly challenged the jurisdiction and validity of show-cause notices issued in Form GST DRG-01. The court noted that the rejection of adjournment was technically in line with law because no stay had been granted, but held that fixing final personal hearing for the very next day, with an indication of an ex parte final order, reflected undue haste. On a prima facie view, interference was necessary to preserve the subject matter of the writ petitions, so the hearing was to be adjourned and refixed after the writ petitions were taken up.
A High Court granted interim protection in a GST matter by deferring adjudication where the writ petitions directly challenged the jurisdiction and validity of show-cause notices issued in Form GST DRG-01. The court noted that the rejection of adjournment was technically in line with law because no stay had been granted, but held that fixing final personal hearing for the very next day, with an indication of an ex parte final order, reflected undue haste. On a prima facie view, interference was necessary to preserve the subject matter of the writ petitions, so the hearing was to be adjourned and refixed after the writ petitions were taken up.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
