Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A High Court granted interim protection in a GST matter by deferring adjudication where the writ petitions directly challenged the jurisdiction and validity of show-cause notices issued in Form GST DRG-01. The court noted that the rejection of adjournment was technically in line with law because no stay had been granted, but held that fixing final personal hearing for the very next day, with an indication of an ex parte final order, reflected undue haste. On a prima facie view, interference was necessary to preserve the subject matter of the writ petitions, so the hearing was to be adjourned and refixed after the writ petitions were taken up.
A High Court granted interim protection in a GST matter by deferring adjudication where the writ petitions directly challenged the jurisdiction and validity of show-cause notices issued in Form GST DRG-01. The court noted that the rejection of adjournment was technically in line with law because no stay had been granted, but held that fixing final personal hearing for the very next day, with an indication of an ex parte final order, reflected undue haste. On a prima facie view, interference was necessary to preserve the subject matter of the writ petitions, so the hearing was to be adjourned and refixed after the writ petitions were taken up.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
