Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rough diamonds marked by Galaxy and DiaExpert laser systems were treated as processed rather than natural-state stones because scanning, mapping and surface marking were regarded as working/processing and as engraving under the tariff notes. Applying Rule 1 of the General Rules for Interpretation and the HSN notes to Heading 7102, the goods were classified under tariff item 71023990, not 71023100. On that basis, the customs exemption for rough diamonds under serial No. 345 of Notification No. 50/2017-Cus was denied because the goods were no longer rough diamonds in their natural state.
Rough diamonds marked by Galaxy and DiaExpert laser systems were treated as processed rather than natural-state stones because scanning, mapping and surface marking were regarded as working/processing and as engraving under the tariff notes. Applying Rule 1 of the General Rules for Interpretation and the HSN notes to Heading 7102, the goods were classified under tariff item 71023990, not 71023100. On that basis, the customs exemption for rough diamonds under serial No. 345 of Notification No. 50/2017-Cus was denied because the goods were no longer rough diamonds in their natural state.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.