Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Jurisdiction over GST proceedings is determined by the authority having jurisdiction on the date the power is invoked. If the transferor officer validly initiated or completed an action before the taxable person migrated to another jurisdiction, that action remains valid and the transferee officer must give effect to it. After migration, the transferor officer cannot initiate fresh proceedings; any issue noticed must be sent to the transferee officer. Where proceedings are pending at the time of migration, the transferee officer must take over at that stage, conclude the matter, and handle all consequential actions, including representation and appeals.
Jurisdiction over GST proceedings is determined by the authority having jurisdiction on the date the power is invoked. If the transferor officer validly initiated or completed an action before the taxable person migrated to another jurisdiction, that action remains valid and the transferee officer must give effect to it. After migration, the transferor officer cannot initiate fresh proceedings; any issue noticed must be sent to the transferee officer. Where proceedings are pending at the time of migration, the transferee officer must take over at that stage, conclude the matter, and handle all consequential actions, including representation and appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.