Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Jurisdiction over GST proceedings is determined by the authority having jurisdiction on the date the power is invoked. If the transferor officer validly initiated or completed an action before the taxable person migrated to another jurisdiction, that action remains valid and the transferee officer must give effect to it. After migration, the transferor officer cannot initiate fresh proceedings; any issue noticed must be sent to the transferee officer. Where proceedings are pending at the time of migration, the transferee officer must take over at that stage, conclude the matter, and handle all consequential actions, including representation and appeals.
Jurisdiction over GST proceedings is determined by the authority having jurisdiction on the date the power is invoked. If the transferor officer validly initiated or completed an action before the taxable person migrated to another jurisdiction, that action remains valid and the transferee officer must give effect to it. After migration, the transferor officer cannot initiate fresh proceedings; any issue noticed must be sent to the transferee officer. Where proceedings are pending at the time of migration, the transferee officer must take over at that stage, conclude the matter, and handle all consequential actions, including representation and appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.