Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Denial of an effective opportunity to respond to a show cause notice served through the GST portal vitiated the proceedings. The court found that the petitioner had not received the notice and was therefore unable to file a reply or be heard. On that basis, the adjudication and appeal orders were quashed, the matter was restored to the stage of reply, and fresh consideration with a reasoned order after hearing was directed. The ruling turned on natural justice and procedural fairness, not on the merits of the underlying tax demand.
Denial of an effective opportunity to respond to a show cause notice served through the GST portal vitiated the proceedings. The court found that the petitioner had not received the notice and was therefore unable to file a reply or be heard. On that basis, the adjudication and appeal orders were quashed, the matter was restored to the stage of reply, and fresh consideration with a reasoned order after hearing was directed. The ruling turned on natural justice and procedural fairness, not on the merits of the underlying tax demand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.