Mis-declaration and Concealment: confiscation affirmed, transaction value re-determined and mandatory penalty sustained; redemption allowed on payment...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5861 to 5880 of 96508 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
GST show cause notices issued before expiry of the Section 74 limitation were not time-barred, so the bar of limitation failed. Invocation of the fraud/suppression machinery was also sustained where notices were preceded by DRC-01A intimations and the petitioner had not replied for some tax periods, leaving the matter to be tested through reply and adjudication. Because disputed factual issues arose and each tax year was treated as an independent block, the writ challenge to the notices was not entertained at the notice stage. The writ petitions were dismissed, with liberty to file replies and a direction that final orders be passed after notice and hearing.
GST show cause notices issued before expiry of the Section 74 limitation were not time-barred, so the bar of limitation failed. Invocation of the fraud/suppression machinery was also sustained where notices were preceded by DRC-01A intimations and the petitioner had not replied for some tax periods, leaving the matter to be tested through reply and adjudication. Because disputed factual issues arose and each tax year was treated as an independent block, the writ challenge to the notices was not entertained at the notice stage. The writ petitions were dismissed, with liberty to file replies and a direction that final orders be passed after notice and hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
