Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Deduction under Section 80I on the profits and gains of an industrial undertaking had to be computed without first reducing the deduction claimed under Section 32AB. Applying the Supreme Court's distinction between 'profits and gains' and 'income' in Vijay Industries, the Court held that Section 80I is to be worked out on the undertaking's profits themselves, not on a net figure after the 32AB reduction. The Tribunal was therefore wrong to direct such reduction, and the question was answered for the assessee and against the Revenue.
Deduction under Section 80I on the profits and gains of an industrial undertaking had to be computed without first reducing the deduction claimed under Section 32AB. Applying the Supreme Court's distinction between 'profits and gains' and 'income' in Vijay Industries, the Court held that Section 80I is to be worked out on the undertaking's profits themselves, not on a net figure after the 32AB reduction. The Tribunal was therefore wrong to direct such reduction, and the question was answered for the assessee and against the Revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
