Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Only the profit element embedded in on-money receipts was held taxable, because the Tribunal examined the assessee's disclosed receipts, profit and loss account, gross revenue and project cost, and found that taxing the entire on-money would create an unrealistically high net profit ratio for the real estate business. The Tribunal therefore treated the receipts as containing profit only and, on estimate, enhanced the addition from 20% to 40%. The High Court held this to be a factual appreciation and estimation exercise, not a substantial question of law. Both the Revenue's challenge for full addition and the assessee's challenge to the higher estimate were rejected.
Only the profit element embedded in on-money receipts was held taxable, because the Tribunal examined the assessee's disclosed receipts, profit and loss account, gross revenue and project cost, and found that taxing the entire on-money would create an unrealistically high net profit ratio for the real estate business. The Tribunal therefore treated the receipts as containing profit only and, on estimate, enhanced the addition from 20% to 40%. The High Court held this to be a factual appreciation and estimation exercise, not a substantial question of law. Both the Revenue's challenge for full addition and the assessee's challenge to the higher estimate were rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
