Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under the Interest Tax Act required concealment of chargeable interest or furnishing of inaccurate particulars; where the assessee's earlier non-filing was found bona fide, the interest details were already available on record, and the returns filed in response to notice were accepted without addition, penalty was not leviable. The Court also noted that the deeming principle in Explanation 3 to section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act could not be imported into penalty proceedings under the Interest Tax Act. On these concurrent findings, deletion of the penalty was upheld and the Revenue's appeals failed.
Penalty under the Interest Tax Act required concealment of chargeable interest or furnishing of inaccurate particulars; where the assessee's earlier non-filing was found bona fide, the interest details were already available on record, and the returns filed in response to notice were accepted without addition, penalty was not leviable. The Court also noted that the deeming principle in Explanation 3 to section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act could not be imported into penalty proceedings under the Interest Tax Act. On these concurrent findings, deletion of the penalty was upheld and the Revenue's appeals failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
