Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Penalty under the Interest Tax Act required concealment of chargeable interest or furnishing of inaccurate particulars; where the assessee's earlier non-filing was found bona fide, the interest details were already available on record, and the returns filed in response to notice were accepted without addition, penalty was not leviable. The Court also noted that the deeming principle in Explanation 3 to section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act could not be imported into penalty proceedings under the Interest Tax Act. On these concurrent findings, deletion of the penalty was upheld and the Revenue's appeals failed.
Penalty under the Interest Tax Act required concealment of chargeable interest or furnishing of inaccurate particulars; where the assessee's earlier non-filing was found bona fide, the interest details were already available on record, and the returns filed in response to notice were accepted without addition, penalty was not leviable. The Court also noted that the deeming principle in Explanation 3 to section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act could not be imported into penalty proceedings under the Interest Tax Act. On these concurrent findings, deletion of the penalty was upheld and the Revenue's appeals failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
