Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3061 to 3080 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under the Interest Tax Act required concealment of chargeable interest or furnishing of inaccurate particulars; where the assessee's earlier non-filing was found bona fide, the interest details were already available on record, and the returns filed in response to notice were accepted without addition, penalty was not leviable. The Court also noted that the deeming principle in Explanation 3 to section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act could not be imported into penalty proceedings under the Interest Tax Act. On these concurrent findings, deletion of the penalty was upheld and the Revenue's appeals failed.
Penalty under the Interest Tax Act required concealment of chargeable interest or furnishing of inaccurate particulars; where the assessee's earlier non-filing was found bona fide, the interest details were already available on record, and the returns filed in response to notice were accepted without addition, penalty was not leviable. The Court also noted that the deeming principle in Explanation 3 to section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act could not be imported into penalty proceedings under the Interest Tax Act. On these concurrent findings, deletion of the penalty was upheld and the Revenue's appeals failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
