Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Limitation for assessment under the amended timeline was upheld: the substituted second proviso to section 153(1) extended the time for passing the assessment order for AY 2020-21 to 30.09.2022, so an order dated 28.09.2022 was within time. In faceless assessment, service of a draft assessment order was held necessary only for an eligible assessee; for an ordinary assessee, disclosure through a show-cause notice satisfied the statute. The objection of denial of personal hearing failed because the notice permitted a video-conference hearing and no request was made. Merits-based objections involving disputed facts were left to the statutory appellate forum, and the writ petitions were dismissed with protection on limitation for appeals.
Limitation for assessment under the amended timeline was upheld: the substituted second proviso to section 153(1) extended the time for passing the assessment order for AY 2020-21 to 30.09.2022, so an order dated 28.09.2022 was within time. In faceless assessment, service of a draft assessment order was held necessary only for an eligible assessee; for an ordinary assessee, disclosure through a show-cause notice satisfied the statute. The objection of denial of personal hearing failed because the notice permitted a video-conference hearing and no request was made. Merits-based objections involving disputed facts were left to the statutory appellate forum, and the writ petitions were dismissed with protection on limitation for appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
