Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Interest earned by a co-operative society from investments with a co-operative bank was treated as eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d), following earlier non-jurisdictional precedent. Where conflicting non-jurisdictional High Court views exist, the view favourable to the assessee was preferred. Reliance on Totgars was not accepted to deny the claim in this context. The disallowance was deleted in principle, but the Assessing Officer was asked to verify the actual nature of the interest and then grant consequential relief.
Interest earned by a co-operative society from investments with a co-operative bank was treated as eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d), following earlier non-jurisdictional precedent. Where conflicting non-jurisdictional High Court views exist, the view favourable to the assessee was preferred. Reliance on Totgars was not accepted to deny the claim in this context. The disallowance was deleted in principle, but the Assessing Officer was asked to verify the actual nature of the interest and then grant consequential relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.