Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Interest earned by a co-operative society from investments with a co-operative bank was treated as eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d), following earlier non-jurisdictional precedent. Where conflicting non-jurisdictional High Court views exist, the view favourable to the assessee was preferred. Reliance on Totgars was not accepted to deny the claim in this context. The disallowance was deleted in principle, but the Assessing Officer was asked to verify the actual nature of the interest and then grant consequential relief.
Interest earned by a co-operative society from investments with a co-operative bank was treated as eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d), following earlier non-jurisdictional precedent. Where conflicting non-jurisdictional High Court views exist, the view favourable to the assessee was preferred. Reliance on Totgars was not accepted to deny the claim in this context. The disallowance was deleted in principle, but the Assessing Officer was asked to verify the actual nature of the interest and then grant consequential relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.