Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Interest earned by a co-operative society from investments with a co-operative bank was treated as eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d), following earlier non-jurisdictional precedent. Where conflicting non-jurisdictional High Court views exist, the view favourable to the assessee was preferred. Reliance on Totgars was not accepted to deny the claim in this context. The disallowance was deleted in principle, but the Assessing Officer was asked to verify the actual nature of the interest and then grant consequential relief.
Interest earned by a co-operative society from investments with a co-operative bank was treated as eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d), following earlier non-jurisdictional precedent. Where conflicting non-jurisdictional High Court views exist, the view favourable to the assessee was preferred. Reliance on Totgars was not accepted to deny the claim in this context. The disallowance was deleted in principle, but the Assessing Officer was asked to verify the actual nature of the interest and then grant consequential relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.