Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Interest earned by a co-operative society from investments with a co-operative bank was treated as eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d), following earlier non-jurisdictional precedent. Where conflicting non-jurisdictional High Court views exist, the view favourable to the assessee was preferred. Reliance on Totgars was not accepted to deny the claim in this context. The disallowance was deleted in principle, but the Assessing Officer was asked to verify the actual nature of the interest and then grant consequential relief.
Interest earned by a co-operative society from investments with a co-operative bank was treated as eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d), following earlier non-jurisdictional precedent. Where conflicting non-jurisdictional High Court views exist, the view favourable to the assessee was preferred. Reliance on Totgars was not accepted to deny the claim in this context. The disallowance was deleted in principle, but the Assessing Officer was asked to verify the actual nature of the interest and then grant consequential relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
