Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Computer software acquired by the assessee was held to fall within the depreciable block of assets for computers including computer software, so depreciation had to be allowed at that rate and not as a business or commercial right under the intangible asset head. On section 14A read with Rule 8D, the Tribunal accepted the assessee's own disallowance on the facts, noting no dividend income from equity investments and only nominal exempt LLP profit, and restricted the disallowance to the suo motu amount. For MAT under section 115JB, it followed Vireet Investment and held that a Rule 8D disallowance does not enter book profit, so the addition was deleted and interest was to be recomputed consequentially.
Computer software acquired by the assessee was held to fall within the depreciable block of assets for computers including computer software, so depreciation had to be allowed at that rate and not as a business or commercial right under the intangible asset head. On section 14A read with Rule 8D, the Tribunal accepted the assessee's own disallowance on the facts, noting no dividend income from equity investments and only nominal exempt LLP profit, and restricted the disallowance to the suo motu amount. For MAT under section 115JB, it followed Vireet Investment and held that a Rule 8D disallowance does not enter book profit, so the addition was deleted and interest was to be recomputed consequentially.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.