Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Computer software acquired by the assessee was held to fall within the depreciable block of assets for computers including computer software, so depreciation had to be allowed at that rate and not as a business or commercial right under the intangible asset head. On section 14A read with Rule 8D, the Tribunal accepted the assessee's own disallowance on the facts, noting no dividend income from equity investments and only nominal exempt LLP profit, and restricted the disallowance to the suo motu amount. For MAT under section 115JB, it followed Vireet Investment and held that a Rule 8D disallowance does not enter book profit, so the addition was deleted and interest was to be recomputed consequentially.
Computer software acquired by the assessee was held to fall within the depreciable block of assets for computers including computer software, so depreciation had to be allowed at that rate and not as a business or commercial right under the intangible asset head. On section 14A read with Rule 8D, the Tribunal accepted the assessee's own disallowance on the facts, noting no dividend income from equity investments and only nominal exempt LLP profit, and restricted the disallowance to the suo motu amount. For MAT under section 115JB, it followed Vireet Investment and held that a Rule 8D disallowance does not enter book profit, so the addition was deleted and interest was to be recomputed consequentially.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.