Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Vicarious liability for dishonoured company cheques may extend to non-signatory directors where complaints contain foundational responsibility avermen...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Computer software acquired by the assessee was held to fall within the depreciable block of assets for computers including computer software, so depreciation had to be allowed at that rate and not as a business or commercial right under the intangible asset head. On section 14A read with Rule 8D, the Tribunal accepted the assessee's own disallowance on the facts, noting no dividend income from equity investments and only nominal exempt LLP profit, and restricted the disallowance to the suo motu amount. For MAT under section 115JB, it followed Vireet Investment and held that a Rule 8D disallowance does not enter book profit, so the addition was deleted and interest was to be recomputed consequentially.
Computer software acquired by the assessee was held to fall within the depreciable block of assets for computers including computer software, so depreciation had to be allowed at that rate and not as a business or commercial right under the intangible asset head. On section 14A read with Rule 8D, the Tribunal accepted the assessee's own disallowance on the facts, noting no dividend income from equity investments and only nominal exempt LLP profit, and restricted the disallowance to the suo motu amount. For MAT under section 115JB, it followed Vireet Investment and held that a Rule 8D disallowance does not enter book profit, so the addition was deleted and interest was to be recomputed consequentially.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.