Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Computer software acquired by the assessee was held to fall within the depreciable block of assets for computers including computer software, so depreciation had to be allowed at that rate and not as a business or commercial right under the intangible asset head. On section 14A read with Rule 8D, the Tribunal accepted the assessee's own disallowance on the facts, noting no dividend income from equity investments and only nominal exempt LLP profit, and restricted the disallowance to the suo motu amount. For MAT under section 115JB, it followed Vireet Investment and held that a Rule 8D disallowance does not enter book profit, so the addition was deleted and interest was to be recomputed consequentially.
Computer software acquired by the assessee was held to fall within the depreciable block of assets for computers including computer software, so depreciation had to be allowed at that rate and not as a business or commercial right under the intangible asset head. On section 14A read with Rule 8D, the Tribunal accepted the assessee's own disallowance on the facts, noting no dividend income from equity investments and only nominal exempt LLP profit, and restricted the disallowance to the suo motu amount. For MAT under section 115JB, it followed Vireet Investment and held that a Rule 8D disallowance does not enter book profit, so the addition was deleted and interest was to be recomputed consequentially.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.