Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Interest earned from deposits placed with co-operative banks was held eligible for deduction because a co-operative bank was treated as a co-operative society for section 80P(2)(d). Revenue's reliance on Totgar's Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. was rejected as distinguishable on facts, since that precedent did not concern deposits with a co-operative society. On that basis, the disallowance made by the first appellate authority could not stand. The same reasoning was applied to the other two assessment years on identical facts, and deduction was allowed for all three years.
Interest earned from deposits placed with co-operative banks was held eligible for deduction because a co-operative bank was treated as a co-operative society for section 80P(2)(d). Revenue's reliance on Totgar's Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. was rejected as distinguishable on facts, since that precedent did not concern deposits with a co-operative society. On that basis, the disallowance made by the first appellate authority could not stand. The same reasoning was applied to the other two assessment years on identical facts, and deduction was allowed for all three years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.