Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Routine back-office support services were not royalty under the applicable DTAAs because the agreements showed no grant of rights in copyright, patents, designs, secret processes or equipment, and the domestic Act could not override the more beneficial treaty. The same receipts were also treated as business profits and, in the absence of a permanent establishment in India, not taxable in India. Claims against fee for delayed return filing and interest for delayed filing were remanded for verification of whether the returns were filed within time. The challenge to initiation of penalty under the anti-underreporting provision was rejected as premature.
Routine back-office support services were not royalty under the applicable DTAAs because the agreements showed no grant of rights in copyright, patents, designs, secret processes or equipment, and the domestic Act could not override the more beneficial treaty. The same receipts were also treated as business profits and, in the absence of a permanent establishment in India, not taxable in India. Claims against fee for delayed return filing and interest for delayed filing were remanded for verification of whether the returns were filed within time. The challenge to initiation of penalty under the anti-underreporting provision was rejected as premature.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.