Section 10A and related deductions: Tribunal rejects separate-undertaking claim, but allows loss set-off, ESOP cost and foreign tax credit in principl...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4201 to 4220 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In trading cases involving alleged bogus purchases, accepted sales and bank-channel payments support a restricted profit estimate rather than full deletion of the addition, but the assessee still bears the primary burden to explain the purchases and source of payment. The ITAT noted that the sales were accepted and could not have been achieved without purchases, yet the assessee had not fully proved genuineness of the impugned transactions. It held that applying the gross profit rate from a later year was excessive because earlier years showed much lower margins and a different business model, so profit on the disputed transactions was fairly estimated at 1%, with the additions restricted accordingly.
In trading cases involving alleged bogus purchases, accepted sales and bank-channel payments support a restricted profit estimate rather than full deletion of the addition, but the assessee still bears the primary burden to explain the purchases and source of payment. The ITAT noted that the sales were accepted and could not have been achieved without purchases, yet the assessee had not fully proved genuineness of the impugned transactions. It held that applying the gross profit rate from a later year was excessive because earlier years showed much lower margins and a different business model, so profit on the disputed transactions was fairly estimated at 1%, with the additions restricted accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
