Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Educational trust exemption was sustained despite allegations that development fee collections and surplus indicated capitation fee or profit motive, because the prior year's finding that the assessee was charitable and engaged in education had already been affirmed, and no fresh distinguishing material or proved violation of the capitation fee law was shown. Depreciation on trust assets remained allowable for A.Y. 2014-15, since section 11(6) operates prospectively from A.Y. 2015-16 and depreciation is part of real income computation; the disallowance failed. Capital gains exemption under section 11(1A) was also allowed on compulsory acquisition proceeds, as reinvestment in new capital assets is tested on substance and does not require strict fund-to-fund tracing, with proportionate relief available.
Educational trust exemption was sustained despite allegations that development fee collections and surplus indicated capitation fee or profit motive, because the prior year's finding that the assessee was charitable and engaged in education had already been affirmed, and no fresh distinguishing material or proved violation of the capitation fee law was shown. Depreciation on trust assets remained allowable for A.Y. 2014-15, since section 11(6) operates prospectively from A.Y. 2015-16 and depreciation is part of real income computation; the disallowance failed. Capital gains exemption under section 11(1A) was also allowed on compulsory acquisition proceeds, as reinvestment in new capital assets is tested on substance and does not require strict fund-to-fund tracing, with proportionate relief available.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.