Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Financial irregularities found by SEBI rendered Acropetal Technologies Ltd.'s accounts and margins unreliable, so its exclusion from the comparables set was upheld for transfer pricing purposes. The Tribunal noted that diversion of funds to non-business use can materially distort operating margins and followed prior co-ordinate bench decisions excluding the same company. For intra-group support services, it accepted that a later APA margin could have persuasive value for a non-APA year where the transactions were identical, the FAR profile was unchanged, and documentary evidence supported receipt of services. The transfer pricing adjustment on support services was therefore deleted.
Financial irregularities found by SEBI rendered Acropetal Technologies Ltd.'s accounts and margins unreliable, so its exclusion from the comparables set was upheld for transfer pricing purposes. The Tribunal noted that diversion of funds to non-business use can materially distort operating margins and followed prior co-ordinate bench decisions excluding the same company. For intra-group support services, it accepted that a later APA margin could have persuasive value for a non-APA year where the transactions were identical, the FAR profile was unchanged, and documentary evidence supported receipt of services. The transfer pricing adjustment on support services was therefore deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.