Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Customs seizure of gold bars requires objective material showing reasonable belief of smuggled or foreign origin; mere suspicion, a high purity test report, or a claimed "diamond marking" is insufficient without corroborating evidence. The text also stresses that co-noticee statements must be independently supported and properly brought on record under Section 138B before they can sustain confiscation. Penalty under Section 112(b)(i) applies only where the goods are liable to confiscation and the person knowingly dealt with them or had reason to believe they were so liable. The discussion notes that confiscation and penalties were set aside on the recorded facts.
Customs seizure of gold bars requires objective material showing reasonable belief of smuggled or foreign origin; mere suspicion, a high purity test report, or a claimed "diamond marking" is insufficient without corroborating evidence. The text also stresses that co-noticee statements must be independently supported and properly brought on record under Section 138B before they can sustain confiscation. Penalty under Section 112(b)(i) applies only where the goods are liable to confiscation and the person knowingly dealt with them or had reason to believe they were so liable. The discussion notes that confiscation and penalties were set aside on the recorded facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
