Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Customs seizure of gold bars requires objective material showing reasonable belief of smuggled or foreign origin; mere suspicion, a high purity test report, or a claimed "diamond marking" is insufficient without corroborating evidence. The text also stresses that co-noticee statements must be independently supported and properly brought on record under Section 138B before they can sustain confiscation. Penalty under Section 112(b)(i) applies only where the goods are liable to confiscation and the person knowingly dealt with them or had reason to believe they were so liable. The discussion notes that confiscation and penalties were set aside on the recorded facts.
Customs seizure of gold bars requires objective material showing reasonable belief of smuggled or foreign origin; mere suspicion, a high purity test report, or a claimed "diamond marking" is insufficient without corroborating evidence. The text also stresses that co-noticee statements must be independently supported and properly brought on record under Section 138B before they can sustain confiscation. Penalty under Section 112(b)(i) applies only where the goods are liable to confiscation and the person knowingly dealt with them or had reason to believe they were so liable. The discussion notes that confiscation and penalties were set aside on the recorded facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
