Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Indoor and outdoor units of a VRF air-conditioning system were treated as parts of air conditioners, not complete split system air conditioners, because the imported goods lacked other essential components needed for installation and operation. Purchase orders showed VRF-based models, and the tribunal held that omission of VRF reference in the invoice or import under a single invoice did not change the character of the goods. Following prior precedent, the goods were classified under CTH 8415 9000, and the denial of notification benefit based on a different classification was not sustained.
Indoor and outdoor units of a VRF air-conditioning system were treated as parts of air conditioners, not complete split system air conditioners, because the imported goods lacked other essential components needed for installation and operation. Purchase orders showed VRF-based models, and the tribunal held that omission of VRF reference in the invoice or import under a single invoice did not change the character of the goods. Following prior precedent, the goods were classified under CTH 8415 9000, and the denial of notification benefit based on a different classification was not sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.