Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where a statutory appeal lay before the GST Appellate Tribunal and the Tribunal had been constituted, the High Court declined to examine the merits and directed the petitioner to pursue that appellate remedy. As the writ petition had been prosecuted bona fide before the wrong forum, the Court protected the petitioner on limitation for appeals filed within the time granted, continued the existing interim protection for the limited period specified or until disposal of the stay application, and left all merits open for the Tribunal.
Where a statutory appeal lay before the GST Appellate Tribunal and the Tribunal had been constituted, the High Court declined to examine the merits and directed the petitioner to pursue that appellate remedy. As the writ petition had been prosecuted bona fide before the wrong forum, the Court protected the petitioner on limitation for appeals filed within the time granted, continued the existing interim protection for the limited period specified or until disposal of the stay application, and left all merits open for the Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
