Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3061 to 3080 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where a statutory appeal lay before the GST Appellate Tribunal and the Tribunal had been constituted, the High Court declined to examine the merits and directed the petitioner to pursue that appellate remedy. As the writ petition had been prosecuted bona fide before the wrong forum, the Court protected the petitioner on limitation for appeals filed within the time granted, continued the existing interim protection for the limited period specified or until disposal of the stay application, and left all merits open for the Tribunal.
Where a statutory appeal lay before the GST Appellate Tribunal and the Tribunal had been constituted, the High Court declined to examine the merits and directed the petitioner to pursue that appellate remedy. As the writ petition had been prosecuted bona fide before the wrong forum, the Court protected the petitioner on limitation for appeals filed within the time granted, continued the existing interim protection for the limited period specified or until disposal of the stay application, and left all merits open for the Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.