Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Failure to file a detailed reply and supporting documents before a GST assessment under Section 74 led the High Court to treat the impugned order as having been confirmed without full material and to grant a further opportunity on equitable grounds. The Court noted that additional relevant documents were available and that the disputed tax had already been recovered, so it set aside the assessment and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, permitting a detailed reply and personal hearing before the assessing authority.
Failure to file a detailed reply and supporting documents before a GST assessment under Section 74 led the High Court to treat the impugned order as having been confirmed without full material and to grant a further opportunity on equitable grounds. The Court noted that additional relevant documents were available and that the disputed tax had already been recovered, so it set aside the assessment and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, permitting a detailed reply and personal hearing before the assessing authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
