Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Survey-disclosed income accepted as business income remains eligible for the regular deductions available under the Act, including partners' remuneration under section 40(b). The HC held that once the appellate authorities had finally treated the surrendered amount as business income, the assessee could not be denied the deduction merely because the excess stock was not explained at the time of survey or because the income had earlier remained unrecorded. The Tribunal was therefore wrong to refuse the deduction, and relief for partners' remuneration had to be allowed on that disclosed business income.
Survey-disclosed income accepted as business income remains eligible for the regular deductions available under the Act, including partners' remuneration under section 40(b). The HC held that once the appellate authorities had finally treated the surrendered amount as business income, the assessee could not be denied the deduction merely because the excess stock was not explained at the time of survey or because the income had earlier remained unrecorded. The Tribunal was therefore wrong to refuse the deduction, and relief for partners' remuneration had to be allowed on that disclosed business income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.