Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Survey-disclosed income accepted as business income remains eligible for the regular deductions available under the Act, including partners' remuneration under section 40(b). The HC held that once the appellate authorities had finally treated the surrendered amount as business income, the assessee could not be denied the deduction merely because the excess stock was not explained at the time of survey or because the income had earlier remained unrecorded. The Tribunal was therefore wrong to refuse the deduction, and relief for partners' remuneration had to be allowed on that disclosed business income.
Survey-disclosed income accepted as business income remains eligible for the regular deductions available under the Act, including partners' remuneration under section 40(b). The HC held that once the appellate authorities had finally treated the surrendered amount as business income, the assessee could not be denied the deduction merely because the excess stock was not explained at the time of survey or because the income had earlier remained unrecorded. The Tribunal was therefore wrong to refuse the deduction, and relief for partners' remuneration had to be allowed on that disclosed business income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.