Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Survey-disclosed income accepted as business income remains eligible for the regular deductions available under the Act, including partners' remuneration under section 40(b). The HC held that once the appellate authorities had finally treated the surrendered amount as business income, the assessee could not be denied the deduction merely because the excess stock was not explained at the time of survey or because the income had earlier remained unrecorded. The Tribunal was therefore wrong to refuse the deduction, and relief for partners' remuneration had to be allowed on that disclosed business income.
Survey-disclosed income accepted as business income remains eligible for the regular deductions available under the Act, including partners' remuneration under section 40(b). The HC held that once the appellate authorities had finally treated the surrendered amount as business income, the assessee could not be denied the deduction merely because the excess stock was not explained at the time of survey or because the income had earlier remained unrecorded. The Tribunal was therefore wrong to refuse the deduction, and relief for partners' remuneration had to be allowed on that disclosed business income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.