Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
In a section 68 dispute over an unexplained unsecured loan, the High Court noted that the Tribunal had relied on the undisputed repayment of the loan through banking channels and its disclosure in the books. It accepted the Tribunal's view, supported by jurisdictional precedents, that such repayment and disclosure were sufficient to negate the addition in the absence of further material showing an accommodation entry. The Court found no error in deleting the addition, held that no substantial question of law arose, and dismissed the Revenue's appeals.
In a section 68 dispute over an unexplained unsecured loan, the High Court noted that the Tribunal had relied on the undisputed repayment of the loan through banking channels and its disclosure in the books. It accepted the Tribunal's view, supported by jurisdictional precedents, that such repayment and disclosure were sufficient to negate the addition in the absence of further material showing an accommodation entry. The Court found no error in deleting the addition, held that no substantial question of law arose, and dismissed the Revenue's appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.