Trademark depreciation and section 14A adjustments: ITAT applies consistency, independent book-profit computation, and no disallowance without exempt ...
Rebuttable search presumptions and corroboration standards shaped deletion of unsubstantiated additions, while rental income and limited profit estima...
In a section 68 dispute over an unexplained unsecured loan, the High Court noted that the Tribunal had relied on the undisputed repayment of the loan through banking channels and its disclosure in the books. It accepted the Tribunal's view, supported by jurisdictional precedents, that such repayment and disclosure were sufficient to negate the addition in the absence of further material showing an accommodation entry. The Court found no error in deleting the addition, held that no substantial question of law arose, and dismissed the Revenue's appeals.
In a section 68 dispute over an unexplained unsecured loan, the High Court noted that the Tribunal had relied on the undisputed repayment of the loan through banking channels and its disclosure in the books. It accepted the Tribunal's view, supported by jurisdictional precedents, that such repayment and disclosure were sufficient to negate the addition in the absence of further material showing an accommodation entry. The Court found no error in deleting the addition, held that no substantial question of law arose, and dismissed the Revenue's appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.