Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
In a section 68 dispute over an unexplained unsecured loan, the High Court noted that the Tribunal had relied on the undisputed repayment of the loan through banking channels and its disclosure in the books. It accepted the Tribunal's view, supported by jurisdictional precedents, that such repayment and disclosure were sufficient to negate the addition in the absence of further material showing an accommodation entry. The Court found no error in deleting the addition, held that no substantial question of law arose, and dismissed the Revenue's appeals.
In a section 68 dispute over an unexplained unsecured loan, the High Court noted that the Tribunal had relied on the undisputed repayment of the loan through banking channels and its disclosure in the books. It accepted the Tribunal's view, supported by jurisdictional precedents, that such repayment and disclosure were sufficient to negate the addition in the absence of further material showing an accommodation entry. The Court found no error in deleting the addition, held that no substantial question of law arose, and dismissed the Revenue's appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.