Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
In a section 68 dispute over an unexplained unsecured loan, the High Court noted that the Tribunal had relied on the undisputed repayment of the loan through banking channels and its disclosure in the books. It accepted the Tribunal's view, supported by jurisdictional precedents, that such repayment and disclosure were sufficient to negate the addition in the absence of further material showing an accommodation entry. The Court found no error in deleting the addition, held that no substantial question of law arose, and dismissed the Revenue's appeals.
In a section 68 dispute over an unexplained unsecured loan, the High Court noted that the Tribunal had relied on the undisputed repayment of the loan through banking channels and its disclosure in the books. It accepted the Tribunal's view, supported by jurisdictional precedents, that such repayment and disclosure were sufficient to negate the addition in the absence of further material showing an accommodation entry. The Court found no error in deleting the addition, held that no substantial question of law arose, and dismissed the Revenue's appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.