Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1001 to 1020 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Binding interim judicial directions restrained deduction of tax at source on Leave Fare Concession payments, so the assessee bank could not be treated as an assessee in default for that earlier period. Although the exemption issue on foreign travel had been concluded against the assessee on merits by the Supreme Court, the Tribunal held that section 201(1) could not be invoked while the assessee was complying with the interim restraint order. The consequential interest under section 201(1A) also could not survive. Applying the same reasoning to an identical second appeal, the Tribunal held both demands unsustainable and allowed both appeals.
Binding interim judicial directions restrained deduction of tax at source on Leave Fare Concession payments, so the assessee bank could not be treated as an assessee in default for that earlier period. Although the exemption issue on foreign travel had been concluded against the assessee on merits by the Supreme Court, the Tribunal held that section 201(1) could not be invoked while the assessee was complying with the interim restraint order. The consequential interest under section 201(1A) also could not survive. Applying the same reasoning to an identical second appeal, the Tribunal held both demands unsustainable and allowed both appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.