Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Binding interim judicial directions restrained deduction of tax at source on Leave Fare Concession payments, so the assessee bank could not be treated as an assessee in default for that earlier period. Although the exemption issue on foreign travel had been concluded against the assessee on merits by the Supreme Court, the Tribunal held that section 201(1) could not be invoked while the assessee was complying with the interim restraint order. The consequential interest under section 201(1A) also could not survive. Applying the same reasoning to an identical second appeal, the Tribunal held both demands unsustainable and allowed both appeals.
Binding interim judicial directions restrained deduction of tax at source on Leave Fare Concession payments, so the assessee bank could not be treated as an assessee in default for that earlier period. Although the exemption issue on foreign travel had been concluded against the assessee on merits by the Supreme Court, the Tribunal held that section 201(1) could not be invoked while the assessee was complying with the interim restraint order. The consequential interest under section 201(1A) also could not survive. Applying the same reasoning to an identical second appeal, the Tribunal held both demands unsustainable and allowed both appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.