Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Binding interim judicial directions restrained deduction of tax at source on Leave Fare Concession payments, so the assessee bank could not be treated as an assessee in default for that earlier period. Although the exemption issue on foreign travel had been concluded against the assessee on merits by the Supreme Court, the Tribunal held that section 201(1) could not be invoked while the assessee was complying with the interim restraint order. The consequential interest under section 201(1A) also could not survive. Applying the same reasoning to an identical second appeal, the Tribunal held both demands unsustainable and allowed both appeals.
Binding interim judicial directions restrained deduction of tax at source on Leave Fare Concession payments, so the assessee bank could not be treated as an assessee in default for that earlier period. Although the exemption issue on foreign travel had been concluded against the assessee on merits by the Supreme Court, the Tribunal held that section 201(1) could not be invoked while the assessee was complying with the interim restraint order. The consequential interest under section 201(1A) also could not survive. Applying the same reasoning to an identical second appeal, the Tribunal held both demands unsustainable and allowed both appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.