Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Binding interim judicial directions restrained deduction of tax at source on Leave Fare Concession payments, so the assessee bank could not be treated as an assessee in default for that earlier period. Although the exemption issue on foreign travel had been concluded against the assessee on merits by the Supreme Court, the Tribunal held that section 201(1) could not be invoked while the assessee was complying with the interim restraint order. The consequential interest under section 201(1A) also could not survive. Applying the same reasoning to an identical second appeal, the Tribunal held both demands unsustainable and allowed both appeals.
Binding interim judicial directions restrained deduction of tax at source on Leave Fare Concession payments, so the assessee bank could not be treated as an assessee in default for that earlier period. Although the exemption issue on foreign travel had been concluded against the assessee on merits by the Supreme Court, the Tribunal held that section 201(1) could not be invoked while the assessee was complying with the interim restraint order. The consequential interest under section 201(1A) also could not survive. Applying the same reasoning to an identical second appeal, the Tribunal held both demands unsustainable and allowed both appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.