Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Anti-dumping duty refund claims arising because the levy itself was set aside are not governed by the limited refund mechanism for duty paid in excess of the actual margin of dumping. In such cases, the refund is treated as one for duty not payable at all, and the Customs Act refund provisions apply through the statutory incorporation provision. The pending challenge by the revenue did not change that position, so the refund claim remained maintainable under the Customs Act framework.
Anti-dumping duty refund claims arising because the levy itself was set aside are not governed by the limited refund mechanism for duty paid in excess of the actual margin of dumping. In such cases, the refund is treated as one for duty not payable at all, and the Customs Act refund provisions apply through the statutory incorporation provision. The pending challenge by the revenue did not change that position, so the refund claim remained maintainable under the Customs Act framework.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.